You’re juggling 8 active client projects. Client A needs a logo by Friday. Client B just requested changes to their website. Client C is waiting for your team’s feedback. Client D’s project is blocked because they haven’t sent assets.
Meanwhile, your designers are asking “What should I work on?” Your clients are asking “What’s the status?” And you’re spending 2 hours a day answering both questions instead of doing actual work.
Managing multiple client projects simultaneously is the defining challenge of running a small to medium agency. Product companies can focus deeply on one roadmap. Agencies have to context-switch 20+ times per day between different clients, each with different priorities, deadlines, and expectations.
Most project management advice assumes you’re working on one big project. This guide is different—it’s specifically designed for the agency reality of managing 5-15 concurrent client projects.
You’ll learn a proven framework used by successful agencies to maintain visibility, prioritize effectively, and deliver exceptional work without burning out.
Before diving into solutions, let’s acknowledge why this is genuinely difficult:
Every time you switch from Client A’s branding project to Client B’s website development, your brain needs time to reload context:
Research shows it takes 15-25 minutes to fully regain focus after a context switch. If you’re switching 20 times per day, that’s 5-8 hours of lost productivity per week.
To Client A, their logo redesign is the most important thing happening this week. They expect quick responses, proactive updates, and your full attention.
Client B feels the same way about their website. So does Client C about their campaign. And Client D about their brand guidelines.
But you can’t give 100% attention to 8 different clients. The math doesn’t work. Managing expectations becomes as important as managing projects.
Client A prefers email updates. Client B wants daily Slack messages. Client C needs weekly calls. Client D ghosts you for weeks then demands immediate revisions.
Some clients provide perfect briefs and timely feedback. Others are vague about requirements and slow to respond.
You can’t use the same process for every client—but having 8 different processes creates chaos.
With one project, visibility is easy. With 10 concurrent projects:
Without aggregate visibility, you’re constantly in reactive mode—firefighting urgent requests instead of proactively managing work.
One client’s “quick favor” is manageable. But when 6 out of 10 clients ask for “just one small thing,” your team’s capacity disappears into unbilled work.
Multiply scope creep across multiple clients, and suddenly you’re working 60-hour weeks delivering free work.
Based on conversations with 50+ agency owners, these are the most common pain points:
The problem: Client A’s project is due Friday. Client B just escalated an “urgent” request. Client C has been waiting for feedback. Which takes priority?
Without a clear prioritization system, you’re constantly reacting to whoever shouts loudest or emails most recently.
The problem: Your designers don’t know what to work on next. Your clients don’t know project status. You spend hours manually compiling updates.
When information lives in Slack threads, email chains, and your head, maintaining visibility requires constant manual effort.
The problem: “While you’re working on this, could you also…” Small requests pile up. Suddenly you’ve delivered 30% more work than you quoted.
Without clear boundaries and proactive scope management, profitability erodes across multiple projects.
The problem: Your lead designer is assigned to 4 projects. How do you balance workload? When a new urgent project comes in, who has capacity?
Without visibility into team capacity, you either overload people (burnout) or underutilize them (inefficiency).
The problem: 10 clients × 3 emails per week = 30 client emails. Add internal team communication, and you’re spending more time communicating about work than doing work.
Every client wants updates. Every project needs coordination. Communication becomes overwhelming.
Here’s a proven system for managing multiple client projects without losing your mind. It’s based on five core principles used by successful agencies.
The goal: See all client projects, all active work, and all priorities in one place.
When project information is scattered across tools (Slack, email, Google Docs, PM software), you can’t answer basic questions:
You waste time compiling information that should be instantly visible.
Choose one tool for task tracking. Not Slack plus email plus Sheets plus Asana. One tool.
The requirements:
What works:
What doesn’t work:
Your single source of truth should answer these questions in <10 seconds:
✅ What’s due this week across all clients? ✅ Which projects are blocked waiting on client feedback? ✅ What’s each team member currently working on? ✅ What’s the status of Client X’s project?
If it takes longer than 10 seconds to answer these questions, your system is too complex.
The goal: Reduce cognitive load by making all projects follow the same basic structure.
If every client project is organized differently, you waste mental energy just figuring out where information lives.
Inconsistent structure:
Consistent structure:
Create a project template with standard phases/categories. Example:
📋 Client Onboarding
- Kickoff meeting scheduled
- Design brief received
- Assets collected
- Timeline confirmed
🎨 Design Phase
- Initial concepts
- Client feedback received
- Revisions completed
✅ Delivery & Handoff
- Final files delivered
- Client sign-off received
- Project archived
When you start a new client project, duplicate this template. Customize as needed, but keep the basic structure consistent.
Bad approach: Spend 2 hours customizing workflow for every new client
Good approach: Use standard template, add client-specific tasks as needed
Your template should be 80% applicable to most clients. The other 20% gets customized. This gives you consistency without rigidity.
The goal: Proactively manage client expectations so they’re not constantly asking for updates.
When clients don’t know when to expect updates, they ask for them constantly. This creates communication overload.
Reactive approach: Clients email asking for status → You drop everything to compile an update → Repeat 3x per week
Proactive approach: Set update cadence upfront → Send updates on schedule → Clients rarely ask for additional status
During project kickoff, establish:
Example update cadence:
Standard projects: Weekly email update every Friday
Urgent projects: Daily Slack update at 5pm
Low-touch projects: Bi-weekly updates via email
Hi [Client],
Quick update on [Project Name]:
✅ Completed this week:
- Initial logo concepts delivered
- Homepage wireframes reviewed
⏭️ Next steps:
- Incorporate your feedback on logos
- Start mockups for remaining pages
🚧 Blockers:
- Still waiting on product images (needed by Wed to stay on schedule)
We're on track for delivery by [Date]. Questions? Reply here or let's schedule a call.
[Your Name]
Send this proactively. Don’t wait for clients to ask. When they know updates are coming, they stop interrupting your workflow.
The goal: Know project status at all times without asking your team for constant updates.
If you have to ask “What’s the status?” every day, you’re a bottleneck. Your team spends time reporting instead of working.
But if you don’t track progress, you’re blind to problems until it’s too late.
The balance: Systems that show progress automatically, without manual reporting.
Use task-based tracking (not time tracking).
Instead of asking “How many hours did you spend?”, track deliverables:
❌ “Sarah spent 6 hours on Client A” ✅ “Sarah completed logo concepts for Client A”
Task-based tracking shows:
Tools that automate progress:
Even with automated tracking, watch for these warning signs:
🚩 Tasks sitting in “In Progress” for 5+ days (blocked or stuck?) 🚩 Client hasn’t responded to feedback requests in 1+ week (timeline at risk?) 🚩 Designer assigned to 4 concurrent projects (overloaded?) 🚩 Project with no tasks completed in 7+ days (forgotten?)
Check your overview 1x per day (takes 2-3 minutes with the right tool) and flag anything unusual.
The goal: Catch problems early and reallocate resources before projects slip.
Daily firefighting keeps you reactive. Weekly reviews make you proactive.
A 30-minute weekly review helps you:
Schedule a recurring 30-minute weekly review (Friday afternoon or Monday morning).
Review checklist:
✅ Projects at risk:
✅ Team capacity:
✅ Client responsiveness:
✅ Scope creep check:
✅ Next week priorities:
Output: A clear priority list for the upcoming week. Share with team so everyone’s aligned.
Here are tactical tips from agencies who’ve mastered managing multiple clients:
Instead of: Constantly switching between clients throughout the day
Try this: Dedicate blocks of time to specific clients
Example schedule:
Why it works: Reduces context-switching cost. Your brain stays in “Client A mode” for 2 hours instead of switching every 30 minutes.
Instead of: Weekly status calls with every client (8 clients = 8 hours/week)
Try this: Written status updates + calls only when needed
Why it works:
When to use calls:
During project kickoff, explicitly discuss:
Response times: “We aim to respond to emails within 24 hours on business days. For urgent issues, call or text [number].”
Revision rounds: “This project includes 2 rounds of revisions. Additional revisions are billed at [rate].”
Scope boundaries: “This project covers [X]. Requests beyond this scope will be quoted separately.”
Update cadence: “You’ll receive status updates every [frequency]. If you need an update sooner, just ask.”
Why it works: Reduces ambiguity. Clients know what to expect. Fewer surprises = fewer conflicts.
Make it visible when projects are blocked by client:
In your task management tool:
Why it works:
Instead of: Designers jumping between 6 projects per day
Try this: Assign designers to 2-3 projects max. Batch work by client.
Example:
Why it works: Reduces cognitive load for team. Better quality work. Fewer mistakes from distraction.
Instead of: Estimating “This takes 2 weeks” → scheduling 2 weeks
Try this: Estimate “This takes 2 weeks” → schedule 3 weeks
Why it works:
Buffer time means:
Rule of thumb: Add 30-50% buffer to initial estimates for client projects.
Not all project management tools are built for agencies juggling multiple clients. Here’s what works:
Why it’s ideal for multi-client management:
Best for: Agencies (5-25 people) managing 5-15 concurrent clients
Try Orsane free → No credit card required
Why agencies use it:
Limitations for multi-client:
Best for: Small agencies (2-5 people) with fewer than 5 clients
Why agencies use it:
Limitations for multi-client:
Best for: Agencies wanting a unified workspace (willing to invest setup time)
Why agencies use it:
Limitations for multi-client:
Best for: Ultra-small teams (2-3 people) with no budget
The problem: Spending hours creating unique processes for each client creates chaos.
The fix: Use standard templates. Customize only when truly necessary (20% of projects, not 80%).
The problem: 8 clients × 1-hour weekly calls = 8 hours/week on status updates.
The fix: Default to written updates. Reserve calls for kickoffs, major milestones, and problem-solving.
The problem: “Client A prefers Asana, Client B uses Trello, Client C wants everything in email…”
The fix: Clients don’t need to see your internal PM tool. Use one tool internally. Send clients whatever format they prefer (exported from your single source of truth).
The problem: Timeline slips. You hope to catch up. Client finds out last minute. Trust damaged.
The fix: As soon as you see a delay coming (client slow to respond, team overloaded, scope expanding), communicate proactively:
“We’re still waiting on [X] from you. Without it by [date], we’ll need to push delivery to [new date]. Let me know if you can get this to us sooner.”
Clients appreciate honesty and early warning.
The problem: “While you’re at it, could you also…” × 8 clients = 30% more work for free.
The fix: Be gracious but firm about scope:
“Happy to help with that! Since it’s outside the original scope, I’ll send a quick quote. Should take about [X hours] at [rate]. Want me to add it to this project or handle separately?”
Use this template for your 30-minute weekly review:
📅 WEEKLY AGENCY REVIEW — [Date]
🚨 PROJECTS AT RISK:
- Client X: Waiting on feedback for 10 days (follow up?)
- Client Y: Designer out sick, timeline may slip
- Client Z: Scope expanding (need boundary conversation)
✅ WHAT'S DUE NEXT WEEK:
- Client A: Logo concepts (Thu)
- Client B: Website launch (Tue)
- Client C: Campaign assets (Fri)
👥 TEAM CAPACITY:
- Sarah: 120% capacity (overloaded on Client A + B)
- Mike: 60% capacity (can take on more)
→ ACTION: Reassign Client B tasks from Sarah to Mike
🎯 TOP 3 PRIORITIES THIS WEEK:
1. Launch Client B website (launch Tuesday)
2. Unblock Client X (follow up on feedback)
3. Deliver Client A concepts (due Thursday)
📧 CLIENT COMMUNICATION NEEDED:
- Client X: "Following up on feedback sent 10 days ago..."
- Client Z: "The additional requests are outside scope. Here's a quote..."
- Client B: "Launching Tuesday. Here's what to expect..."
✨ WINS TO CELEBRATE:
- Client D gave amazing testimonial
- Client E signed contract extension
Fill this out every Friday. Share priority list with team. Start Monday aligned.
Managing multiple client projects simultaneously doesn’t require working 70-hour weeks or having superhuman memory.
It requires systems that provide visibility, prioritization, and communication structure.
The five-step framework:
With the right systems, managing 10 clients feels manageable instead of overwhelming.
Your next step: Implement the single source of truth first. Get all client projects into one tool with cross-project visibility. Everything else builds from there.
Try Orsane free for 14 days → Purpose-built for agencies managing multiple clients. Cross-project overview. Lightweight. Team actually uses it.
Depends on project complexity, but most agency PMs can manage 5-10 active client projects with the right systems. Beyond 10, you need additional project managers or automation. Without good systems, even 5 projects feels overwhelming.
For agencies (5-25 people), Orsane is purpose-built for multi-client management with cross-project overview and fast context switching. For smaller teams (2-5 people), Trello works for simple needs. For teams wanting flexibility, Notion (requires setup time). Avoid tools without cross-project visibility.
Use objective criteria: (1) Contract SLA or deadline, (2) Business impact (revenue at risk?), (3) Effort required (quick wins first), (4) Client relationship health. When everything feels urgent, communicate trade-offs to clients: “I can do X by Thursday or Y by Friday. Which is higher priority for you?”
Set boundaries during kickoff (define what’s included and what’s not). Track all requests outside scope. Respond graciously but firmly: “Happy to help with that! Since it’s outside our original agreement, I’ll send a quote. Should take about [X hours]. Want to add it?” Document scope changes in writing.
Weekly email updates work for most clients (what’s done, what’s next, any blockers). Send proactively on a set day/time. Reserve calls for kickoffs, major milestones, or when something goes wrong. Batch client communication (don’t respond to every email immediately—set 1-2 times per day for client emails).
Protect your team from constant context-switching. Assign designers to 2-3 projects max (not 8). Time-block by client. Build buffer time into timelines (30-50% extra). Watch for red flags (tasks sitting 5+ days, one person assigned to too many projects). Weekly reviews help catch overload early.
About Orsane
Orsane is lightweight task management software built specifically for agencies managing multiple client projects. Get cross-project visibility, fast context switching, and team-wide adoption—without enterprise bloat. Learn more at orsane.com.